An Educators Influence

 An Educators Influence

While I read through Baldwin's A Talk to Teachers and Smith's James Baldwin’s Lesson for Teachers in a Time of Turmoil I was drawing connections back to my own experiences and thought about my teachers. Some were unfortunately not really memorable while others I think of as a great influence on my education and outside of the classroom. They were teachers who truly cared for how would turn out in the future. So it leads to the question of what goes into making a great teacher and mentor versus another who simply follows the system for the salary and paycheck (as it is also their livelihood they need to worry about).

Teachers who try and integrate real world applications and knowledge into the lesson plans are what I think makes up a part of being a good teacher and mentor. Smiths states "I realized that rigorous lessons were not mutually exclusive from culturally and politically relevant ones." He recognized that there is more to teaching than simply the numbers and scores of the students. If we were to only focus on the numbers, the students would then be educated ignorantly. Completely and utterly unaware of the world around them and only focused on bringing results. They will not be able to develop themselves and learn about the world for themselves and whichever path they may take. To be raised in the system only to go out into the real world into another system of corporate and numbers. Take this quote from Baldwin, "All this enters the child’s consciousness much sooner than we as adults would like to think it does. As adults, we are easily fooled because we are so anxious to be fooled. But children are very different. Children, not yet aware that it is dangerous to look too deeply at anything, look at everything, look at each other, and draw their own conclusions." As students, we often don't question many things, we are told to learn this subject, do this assignment and turn it in, we simply follow the system. We place our trust in the teacher to teach us what we need for our future. But are they teaching us in conjunction for the real world or are they simply teaching for the sake of scores and their salary. 

I often think about the teachers I've had every since I've went to school. Some were sticklers for the rules and order, some were apathetic, and some cared about the students education and tried their best to propel them in their own ways. I recognize that a fair amount of them taught for the sake of a paycheck, a means for money. One teacher I clearly remember and hold great disdain for was a music teacher in high school. He only cared about the talented musicians in his band classes, so usually the first couple seats. I had the great misfortune of taking his music history class, general music. All he would do is give us a textbook and read from it. Other times he would simply put on a dull documentary that would put anyone in a 50 feet radius to sleep. I did not learn or retain anything useful from that class. But then there was my science teacher who taught their class extremely well and I hold a lot of respect for what she has taught me and the way she does it. The fact of the matter is how did they influence us as people and as students. One class where I spent a school years worth of time and it taught me nothing I would remember and did not help me understand the world around me. The other combined the learning of science along with learning about the real world that we all reside in. Educators are a big influence on children and how they will grow into the world, we should not only teach them basic subjects. But also combine it with learning about the world outside of school culturally and politically.

Comments

  1. These readings came at a great time for me. I had a less then ideal week as an educator and really struggled with apathy for my profession. However, these readings have sparked my passion again and made my think introspectively at how to be better in these situations I felt apathetic in.

    However, I will give a bit of grace towards teachers that may not seem great. Our job is hard, and as I told my students on Friday: the systems in place at schools do not foster the drive and passion that we want or need out of educators, or students, but all of the problems in education are put at our feet. We need to do more, we aren't trying hard enough, failures are our fault. It is quite maddening. As much as I would love to say "yes, these lessons will be implemented at all times and it will be easy", it won't.

    As much as I appreciate these readings and the messages behind them, I think it does us a grave injustice as human beings to be the ones who have to bare societal issues all the time. We are humans, and that cross to bare is why we have such high burnout as teachers. Yes, we should absolutely be fighting the good fight, making the concerted effort to see our students as people, making lessons applicable to them as human beings, but we can not fix it all. This mentality creates a toxic environment (at least in me) in not doing enough, not being good enough to save every kid. Yes I can do more, and I am hyper critical about how to improve myself. However if we don't cut ourself some slack, and realize we can't save the world, I worry about all the great teachers we will lose.

    I realize after typing this I may be projecting some feelings, but this weeks readings and blog posts are a bit cathartic for me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I fond this reading to be really interesting as I've done a lot of thinking about my past educators in highschool, and did a lot of thinking about how they shaped my worldview. We've all had teachers who suffer from burnout, the ones who seem to only be in it for the money, or retirement. I agree with Wilson's assessment that teaching isn't easy and the systems in place don't reward passionate highly driven, and creative teachers. It's important to give grace.

    On the other hand, there are educators out there who really do their best to inject real world thinking into their lessons and attempt to give it their all, when they can.

    I remember a bad situation my sophomore and junior year when I took APUSH and then APGOV with a teacher who had no real desire to be in the classroom. Her passion was to be working in DC to help shape educational policy, a noble and necessary cause, but as a result we suffered from a lack of passion and drive from her. It goes to show that the best educators are not exactly the people who have the most difficult degrees, but the ones who demonstrate meaningful passion and drive for helping the classroom and working with the kids. It isn't easy work, and it may never be easy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This reading definitely put my past educators under review in my head, identifying key characteristics and traits that I as a future educator would want to emulate and found that teachers who built my worldview, created opportunities to work and help communities, and research the environments we want to make a difference in are the educators I want to be like.
    Contextualizing your lessons, (especially in topics such as History, Civics, and Sociology) are incredibly important to the information building of lesson plans and units. Teachers that do this create an environment of learning that can be considered a more holistic approach to educating students.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That last point about learning science and how it relates to the world around us is actually what my advisor in this program did during his time as a high school chemistry teacher in CPS! He and I discussed how to make chemistry more engaging with the students, and he prefaced his own teaching style with his perspective being that STEM in general is seen as an avenue that one takes to leave their community while the humanities is typically the route one takes to serve their community. What my advisor did to address this problem was to assign a final project that gave students the opportunity to interface with their community and apply what they learned outside of the classroom. I actually did something really similar during my senior year of college for a history course, and it's easily the most memorable course I ever took outside of a few insanely difficult chemistry courses. I agree that teachers need to put in more effort to make the content more applicable to the students' day-to-day life, but there is also something to be said about prioritizing teaching students literacy first within any given discipline before jumping to ambitious projects and teaching methods.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Buehl Chap. 5

Digital and Disciplinary Literacies

Language